Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Apple Watch Ultra 2: The Ultimate Adventure Watch – PCMag

Table of Contents

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 is an ultra-tough smartwatch that can withstand extreme temperatures, differing altitudes, and even ocean water and water sports. Considering its name, Samsung’s recently announced Galaxy Watch Ultra isn’t hiding its influences and is built to withstand rugged adventuring with many of the same features as the Apple Watch. But which one is better? Granted, they work with different phone platforms, so the choice is easy if you are happy with your Android or iPhone and just want a durable smartwatch to go with it. But if you’re platform agnostic, we’re here to compare the specs side by side to figure out the best adventuring watch for you.

Galaxy Watch Ultra and Galaxy Watch 7: Hands-On
You Can Trust Our Reviews
Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. Read our editorial mission & see how we test.

Full Specs

Full Specs
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Apple Watch Ultra 2
Phone OS Compatibility
Phone OS Compatibility

Android

iOS

Watch OS
Watch OS

Wear OS

watchOS

Processor
Processor

Samsung Exynos W1000

Apple S9

Display Size
Display Size

1.5 inches

1.9 inches

Display Type
Display Type

Super AMOLED

OLED

Fitness Features
Fitness Features

Accelerometer, GPS, Heart Rate Monitor, Blood Oxygen Monitor, Temperature Sensor, Pedometer, Gyroscope, Barometer

Accelerometer, GPS, Heart Rate Monitor, Blood Oxygen Monitor, Temperature Sensor

Estimated Battery Life
Estimated Battery Life

2-3 days

36 hours

Separate App Store
Separate App Store

Phone Call Capacity
Phone Call Capacity

Price and Compatibility

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 costs $799, twice as much as the base Apple Watch Series 9 ($399). It works with iPhones. Specifically, it works with the iPhone XS or later and requires the phone to be running iOS 17 or later. It does not work with Android phones.

The Galaxy Watch Ultra costs $649.99, which is more than twice as much as Samsung’s base Galaxy Watch 7 ($299.99)—and notably undercuts the Apple Watch Ultra 2 by $150. The Galaxy Watch Ultra doesn’t work with iPhones. It requires a phone running Android 11 or later and saves some of its best features, including AI insights, for Samsung Galaxy phones specifically.

Again, if you know your platform of choice and want a durable sports watch, you already have your answer. For the platform-agnostic and the curious, the Galaxy Watch clearly wins out on price.

Winner: Galaxy Watch Ultra

Durability

The Galaxy Watch Ultra can indeed rock and roll in harsh environments. The casing is made of aerospace titanium. It has an ingress protection rating of IP68 and a MIL-STD 810H certification—the standard used for military equipment confirming it has survived rigorous testing. It can withstand extreme temperature changes, blowing sand, and other environmental stressors such as vibration and shock. It’s also rated to work at altitudes ranging from 1,640 feet below sea level to 29,528 feet above it.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (Credit: Eric Zeman)

All of these specs stack up well against the Apple Watch Ultra 2, which also has a MIL-STD 810H certification and is safe to wear at the same range of altitudes. The Ultra 2 has a different ingress rating—IP6X. It’s equally impervious to dust, but not officially rated for water protection in this test.

However, it’s in the water that the Apple Watch Ultra 2 beats the Galaxy Watch Ultra. The Samsung model can withstand ocean water, and with a 10ATM rating, it can withstand water pressure at depths up to 328 feet deep. That said, the fine print on the Galaxy Watch Ultra’s spec page notes that it is unsuitable for high-pressure water activities like jet-skiing and deep diving. You can take the Galaxy Watch Ultra climbing, spelunking, or snorkeling, but you’ll need to leave it behind if you want to water ski or scuba dive.

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 is better for water sports. (Credit: Ali Jaber)

The Apple Watch 2 has a WR100 rating and EN13319 certification (the international standard for diving accessories). It can withstand the rigors of water sports and even act as a diving computer.

The Galaxy Watch Ultra keeps up with the Apple Watch 2 when adventuring on land, but if you’re heading beneath the waves, the Apple Watch 2’s extra price is worth it.

Winner: Apple Watch Ultra 2

Screen

The Galaxy Watch Ultra has a 1.5-inch, 480-by-480-pixel Super AMOLED screen. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 has a bigger 1.91-inch OLED screen 502 by 410 pixels. Both displays reach a maximum brightness of 3,000 nits, so you can see them in bright sunlight.

Winner: Apple Watch Ultra 2

Connectivity

Both watches support dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC for mobile payments, and LTE connectivity for data. Neither comes in a Bluetooth-only model. Both offer dual-frequency GPS to track your location more precisely and offer guided directions while you work out.

Winner: Tie

Standout Features

Thanks to their operating systems, the Galaxy Watch Ultra and Apple Watch Ultra 2 have software features that match their base-level counterparts. The Galaxy Watch Ultra will ship with Google’s Wear OS 5 and Samsung’s One UI 6 overlay. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 ships with watchOS 10, which you’ll be able to upgrade to watchOS 11 later this year.

Both offer a wide variety of health and sleep-tracking features. Both have a customizable action button to start or pause a workout. Both also support gesture controls, so you can double-tap your fingers to perform certain functions on your watch or the phone connected to it. Both have an emergency siren, though Apple’s is slightly louder at 86dB vs. 85dB.

The action button on the Galaxy Watch Ultra (Credit: Eric Zeman)

Samsung offers more robust sleep tracking. It can sense snoring when paired with a Samsung phone and has FDA approval for detecting sleep apnea. It also uses a Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis sensor for body fat and other body composition measurements similar to a smart scale. It can offer even deeper insight into your metabolic age through a metric called the AGEs Index.

When working out, the Samsung Galaxy Watch can calculate your maximum cycling power, or Functional Power Threshold (FTP), in just four minutes. It takes the Apple Watch Ultra 2 several sessions to calculate the same metric.

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 is good at monitoring workouts. It showed extremely accurate heart rate readings in testing, and because of the wide interoperability of watchOS, it works with more third-party fitness tracking apps. Wear OS is catching up, but Apple is still in the lead.

The right side button and digitial crown on the Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Credit: Angela Moscaritolo)

The Galaxy Watch Ultra will debut a new Samsung feature allowing you to race yourself, so you can directly compare your workout times against your old self.

The Galaxy Watch Ultra will have a few AI-enabled features courtesy of Galaxy AI. Its holistic Energy Score feature rates your current well-being based on sleep and activity on a scale of 0 to 100. Wellness Tips use that score to offer personalized advice.

Apple’s watchOS 11 won’t be receiving any AI upgrades that we know about, but the Ultra 2 will be able to offer a similar holistic wellness assessment with an upcoming feature called Training Load.

Winner: Tie

Battery Life

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 delivers about 55 hours of charge with its always-on display turned to maximum brightness. We haven’t been able to test the Galaxy Watch Ultra’s battery yet, but it’s rated to last 100 hours in power-saving mode and 48 hours in exercise power-saving mode. Samsung hasn’t specified how long it should last when not in some form of power-saving mode.

Winner: Too early to tell

Adventure Time

We’re testing the Galaxy Watch Ultra now to see how it measures up to the Apple Watch Ultra 2 in the real world. We’re eager to see if the Galaxy Watch Ultra offers a similar experience to the Apple Watch at a lower price, so make sure to check back soon for our full review.

Until then, check out all of the best smartwatches we’ve tested.

Source: Read More  

Author (if provided):

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *